칸트의 판단비판Kant's Critique of Judgement ,Immanuel Kant
목차의 중간생략함.책갈피나 책본문을 참조바람니다.
CONTENTS
PAGE
EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION xi
PREFACE 1
INTRODUCTION 7
I.Of the division of Philosophy 7
II.Of the realm of Philosophy in general 11
III.
Of the Critique of Judgement as a means of combining the two
parts of Philosophy into a whole 14
IV.Of Judgement as a faculty legislating a priori 17
V.
The principle of the formal purposiveness of nature is a
transcendental principle of Judgement 20
VI.
Of the combination of the feeling of pleasure with the concept of
the purposiveness of nature 27
VII.Of the aesthetical representation of the purposiveness of nature 30
VIII.Of the logical representation of the purposiveness of nature 35
IX.
Of the connexion of the legislation of Understanding with that of
Reason by means of the Judgement 39
FIRST PART.―CRITIQUE OF THE AESTHETICAL JUDGEMENT 43
First Division.―Analytic of the Aesthetical Judgement 45
First Book.―Analytic of the Beautiful 45
First Moment of the judgement of taste, according to quality 45
§ 1. The judgement of taste is aesthetical 45
Second Moment of the judgement of taste, viz. according to quantity 55
§ 6. The Beautiful is that which apart from concepts is represented as
the object of a universal satisfaction 55
Third Moment of judgements of taste according to the relation of the
purposes which are brought into consideration therein 67
§ 10. Of purposiveness in general 67
Fourth Moment of the judgement of taste, according to the modality of
the satisfaction in the object 91
§ 18. What the modality in a judgement of taste is 91
General remark on the first section of the Analytic 96vii
Second Book.―Analytic of the Sublime 101
§ 23. Transition from the faculty which judges of the Beautiful to that
which judges of the Sublime 101
Second Division.―Dialectic of the Aesthetical Judgement 229
§ 60. Appendix:―Of the method of Taste 253
SECOND PART.―CRITIQUE OF THE TELEOLOGICAL JUDGEMENT 257
§ 61. Of the objective purposiveness of Nature 259
First Division.―Analytic of the Teleological Judgement 262
Second Division.―Dialectic of the Teleological Judgement 292ix
Appendix.―Methodology of the Teleological Judgement 334
§ 91. Of the kind of belief produced by a practical faith 403
General remark on Teleology 414
칸트의 판단비판Kant's Critique of Judgement ,Immanuel Kant .
칸트의 3대비판론
칸트는 경험론에 있어서의 장점인 경험(인식의 대상)과 합리론의 장점인 이성(인식의 주체)을 비판적으로 종합함으로써 새로운 비판철학의 체계를 수립 완성하였다. 그는 내용 없는 사상은 공허하고 개념 없는 직관은 맹목이다.라는 말로 경험론의 산만성과 합리론의 공허성을 비판했다. 인식의 내용면에서는 경험론을 수용하고, 인식의 형식면에서는 합리론을 취했다.
칸트의 3대 비판
⑴ 순수이성 비판
⑵ 실천이성비판
⑶ 판단력 비판
