논리학.Logic, by Carveth Read

인문 > 논리학/윤리학

논리학.Logic, by Carveth Read
PREFACE
In this edition of my Logic, the text has been revised throughout, several
passages have been rewritten, and some sections added. The chief alterations
and additions occur in cc. i., v., ix., xiii., xvi., xvii., xx.
The work may be considered, on the whole, as attached to the school of Mill;
to whose System of Logic, and to Bain's Logic, it is deeply indebted. Amongst
the works of living writers, the Empirical Logic of Dr. Venn and the Formal Logic
of Dr. Keynes have given me most assistance. To some others
acknowledgments have been made as occasion arose.
For the further study of contemporary opinion, accessible in English, one may
turn to such works as Mr. Bradley's Principles of Logic, Dr. Bosanquet's Logic;
or the Morphology of Knowledge, Prof. Hobhouse's Theory of Knowledge,
Jevon's Principles of Science, and Sigwart's Logic. Ueberweg's Logic, and
History of Logical Doctrine is invaluable for the history of our subject. The
attitude toward Logic of the Pragmatists or Humanists may best be studied in
Dr. Schiller's Formal Logic, and in Mr. Alfred Sidgwick's Process of Argument
and recent Elementary Logic. The second part of this last work, on the "Risks of
Reasoning," gives an admirably succinct account of their position. I agree with
the Humanists that, in all argument, the important thing to attend to is the
meaning, and that the most serious difficulties of reasoning occur in dealing
with the matter reasoned about; but I find [ Pg vi] that a pure science of relation
has a necessary place in the system of knowledge, and that the formulæ known